StickMeta

P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby vs TC2.5 / True

Side by side curve comparison. Specs, cross-brand equivalents, and which players use each.

Specs
Face angleSlightly Open
Curve depthModerate
Lie6
TypeMid-Toe
Brand names
P29T92P92SakicW03PP92PP26Blade 1
Full curve details →
Specs
Face angleOpen
Curve depthModerate
Lie5
TypeToe
Brand names
PP90TTC2.5P90T
Full curve details →

Key Differences

Face AngleP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a slightly open face angle, TC2.5 / True has a open face angle. A more open face lifts shots more easily; a more closed face keeps the puck lower.
Curve DepthBoth curves share the same depth (Moderate).
LieP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a lie of 6, TC2.5 / True has a lie of 5. P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a higher lie, which suits players who carry the puck close to their body.
Curve TypeP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby is a Mid-Toe curve (versatile with a slight toe bias). TC2.5 / True is a Toe curve (toe-focused, better for wrist shots and toe drags).

Who Uses These Curves

Not sure which curve is right for you?

Use our curve translator to find your equivalent across every brand.

P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby vs TC2.5 / True | Curve Comparison | StickMeta