StickMeta

P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby vs PM9 / Larkin / P14 / Duchene

Side by side curve comparison. Specs, cross-brand equivalents, and which players use each.

Specs
Face angleSlightly Open
Curve depthModerate
Lie6
TypeMid-Toe
Brand names
P29T92P92SakicW03PP92PP26Blade 1
Full curve details →
Specs
Face angleSlightly Open
Curve depthSlight
Lie5
TypeToe
Brand names
P14PM9W01PP96Blade 3
Full curve details →

Key Differences

Face AngleBoth curves share the same face angle (Slightly Open).
Curve DepthP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a deeper curve (Moderate) versus the slight PM9 / Larkin / P14 / Duchene. Deeper curves add puck control and shooting power but reduce backhand feel.
LieP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a lie of 6, PM9 / Larkin / P14 / Duchene has a lie of 5. P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a higher lie, which suits players who carry the puck close to their body.
Curve TypeP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby is a Mid-Toe curve (versatile with a slight toe bias). PM9 / Larkin / P14 / Duchene is a Toe curve (toe-focused, better for wrist shots and toe drags).

Who Uses These Curves

Not sure which curve is right for you?

Use our curve translator to find your equivalent across every brand.

P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby vs PM9 / Larkin / P14 / Duchene | Curve Comparison | StickMeta