StickMeta

P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby vs PL29

Side by side curve comparison. Specs, cross-brand equivalents, and which players use each.

Specs
Face angleSlightly Open
Curve depthModerate
Lie6
TypeMid-Toe
Brand names
P29T92P92SakicW03PP92PP26Blade 1
Full curve details →
PL29Mid
Specs
Face angleSlightly Open
Curve depthSlight
Lie
TypeMid
Brand names
PL29
Full curve details →

Key Differences

Face AngleBoth curves share the same face angle (Slightly Open).
Curve DepthP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a deeper curve (Moderate) versus the slight PL29. Deeper curves add puck control and shooting power but reduce backhand feel.
LieP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a lie of 6, PL29 has a lie of null. P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a higher lie, which suits players who carry the puck close to their body.
Curve TypeP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby is a Mid-Toe curve (versatile with a slight toe bias). PL29 is a Mid curve (balanced and all-purpose).

Who Uses These Curves

PL29No notable players listed yet.

Not sure which curve is right for you?

Use our curve translator to find your equivalent across every brand.

P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby vs PL29 | Curve Comparison | StickMeta