StickMeta

P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby vs PL29

Side by side curve comparison. Specs, cross-brand equivalents, and which players use each.

Specs
Face angleSlightly Open
Curve depthModerate
Lie6
TypeMid-Toe
Brand names
P29T92P92SakicW03PP92PP26Blade 1
Full curve details →
PL29Mid
Specs
Face angleSlightly Open
Curve depthSlight
Lie
TypeMid
Brand names
PL29
Full curve details →

Key Differences

Face AngleBoth curves share the same face angle (Slightly Open).
Curve DepthP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a deeper curve (Moderate) versus the slight PL29. Deeper curves add puck control and shooting power but reduce backhand feel.
LieP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a lie of 6, PL29 has a lie of null. P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a higher lie, which suits players who carry the puck close to their body.
Curve TypeP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby is a Mid-Toe curve (versatile with a slight toe bias). PL29 is a Mid curve (balanced and all-purpose).

Who Uses These Curves

PL29No notable players listed yet.

Switching brands? Don't guess your curve

Curve names don't match across brands, and the wrong one changes how the puck feels on your blade. Translate your curve to its exact equivalent on every brand in seconds.

P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby vs PL29 | Curve Comparison | StickMeta