StickMeta

P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby vs P97

Side by side curve comparison. Specs, cross-brand equivalents, and which players use each.

Specs
Face angleSlightly Open
Curve depthModerate
Lie6
TypeMid-Toe
Brand names
P29T92P92SakicW03PP92PP26Blade 1
Full curve details →
P97Mid
Specs
Face angleOpen
Curve depthModerate
Lie
TypeMid
Brand names
P97
Full curve details →

Key Differences

Face AngleP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a slightly open face angle, P97 has a open face angle. A more open face lifts shots more easily; a more closed face keeps the puck lower.
Curve DepthBoth curves share the same depth (Moderate).
LieP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a lie of 6, P97 has a lie of null. P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby has a higher lie, which suits players who carry the puck close to their body.
Curve TypeP92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby is a Mid-Toe curve (versatile with a slight toe bias). P97 is a Mid curve (balanced and all-purpose).

Who Uses These Curves

P97No notable players listed yet.

Switching brands? Don't guess your curve

Curve names don't match across brands, and the wrong one changes how the puck feels on your blade. Translate your curve to its exact equivalent on every brand in seconds.

P92 / Matthews / P29 / Crosby vs P97 | Curve Comparison | StickMeta