StickMeta

P106 / Richards / P50 / Gagne vs PL29

Side by side curve comparison. Specs, cross-brand equivalents, and which players use each.

Specs
Face angleOpen
Curve depthSlight
Lie5
TypeMid-Heel
Brand names
P50P106PP09Blade 8
Full curve details →
PL29Mid
Specs
Face angleSlightly Open
Curve depthSlight
Lie
TypeMid
Brand names
PL29
Full curve details →

Key Differences

Face AngleP106 / Richards / P50 / Gagne has a open face angle, PL29 has a slightly open face angle. A more open face lifts shots more easily; a more closed face keeps the puck lower.
Curve DepthBoth curves share the same depth (Slight).
LieP106 / Richards / P50 / Gagne has a lie of 5, PL29 has a lie of null. P106 / Richards / P50 / Gagne has a higher lie, which suits players who carry the puck close to their body.
Curve TypeP106 / Richards / P50 / Gagne is a Mid-Heel curve (Mid-Heel). PL29 is a Mid curve (balanced and all-purpose).

Who Uses These Curves

P106 / Richards / P50 / Gagne
PL29No notable players listed yet.

Switching brands? Don't guess your curve

Curve names don't match across brands, and the wrong one changes how the puck feels on your blade. Translate your curve to its exact equivalent on every brand in seconds.

P106 / Richards / P50 / Gagne vs PL29 | Curve Comparison | StickMeta